Case LawHigh Court › Ita/135/2007 Of Commissioner Income Tax...

Ita/135/2007 Of Commissioner Income Tax And Another v. Iqbalpur Co-Operative Cane Development

High Court 11 Dec 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ita/135/2007 Of Commissioner Income Tax And Another v. Iqbalpur Co-Operative Cane Development
Date of order
11 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/135/2007 Of Commissioner Income Tax And Another v. Iqbalpur Co-Operative Cane Development, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA No. 135 of 2007 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate, present for the appellants / review applicants. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate, present for the respondent /assessee. This is Application No. 10372 of 2009, moved on behalf of the review applicants, for condonation of delay in moving the Review Application No. 913 of 2009, for review and recall of order dated 08.05.2009 passed by this Court in Income Tax Appeal No. 135 of 2007. Heard. The application for condonation of delay is allowed. Delay is condoned. Also heard on review application. Learned counsel for the review applicants argued that the interest earned by the respondent through FDRs was not ‘attributable’ to the activities of the cooperative society (Assessee). This Court in its judgment sought to be reviewed, has given detailed reasons after interpreting the provisions of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The review jurisdiction has a limited scope and this Court cannot sit as an appellate authority over its own order. For the reasons as discussed above, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record, which requires review or recall of the order dated 08.05.2009, passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 135 of 2007. Mere fact that another view is possible is no ground to review or recall the order. Therefore, the review application is rejected. (B.S.V., J.) (P.C.P., J.) 11.12.2009
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan