Ita/136/2005 Of Commnr.income Tax v. Rajpath Agency
High Court
02 Feb 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Ita/136/2005 Of Commnr.income Tax v. Rajpath Agency
Date of order
02 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/136/2005 Of Commnr.income Tax v. Rajpath Agency, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ITA No.136 of 2005
…. Appellant
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar
Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel -versus- …. Respondent
M/s. Rajpath Agency
None
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 02.02.2022
Order No.
07.
1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
2. Mr. Satapathy, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing
for the Appellant-Department informs the Court that the tax effect is below the monetary limit.
3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
4. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25[th] March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15[th] April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos. No.514 and 515 dated 7[th] January, 2022.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
S.K. Guin
( R.K. Pattanaik )
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue