Ita v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 27027 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A BETWEEN: ILT.A. NO.136 OF 2011 DR. 1T.V. NAGARATHNAMMAPROP. MARUTI NURSING &MATERNITY HOME, NO.5LYANNA SETTY LAYOUT|MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560026. (BY MR. A. SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL WITH.MR. S. ANNAMALAI, ADV., FOR|MR. M. LAVA, ADV.,) .... APPELLAN/ AND* THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD 4(4), UNITY BUILDING ANNEX.MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-56002/7. (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) .., RESPONDENT THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX|ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.01.2011 PASSEDIN ITA NO.47(BANG)/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1999-2000, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW,STATED THEREIN. | (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO.THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY. THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.47(BANG)/2010 DATED 07.01.2011, IN.THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, | ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.A.Snankar, jiearnecSenior.counsel]for| Mr.S.Annamalali, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for tne assessee nas filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivetne same if occasion so arises. Sd/-JUDGE RV Sd/-JUDGE