Ita/136/2014 Of The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Exotic Fruits Pvt Ltd
High Court
04 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/136/2014 Of The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Exotic Fruits Pvt Ltd
Date of order
04 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/136/2014 Of The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Exotic Fruits Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
L
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY
AND
THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS|
-INCOME TAX APPEAL Nos.136/2014 & 5759/2015
BETWEEN:
1.THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION,|
RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN,NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,BANGALORE
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION).WARD-1 (1), RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE,.., APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND & SRI DILIP M., ADVS.)
AND:
M/S EXOTIC FRUITS PVT LTDNO.514, 6 CROSS,Il STAGE, INDIRANAGAR,BANGALORE-560 038
.., RESPONDENT
(BY SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADV.)
THESE ITAsS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:04/10/2013 PASSED IN)ITA NO.1009, 1010, 1012 & 1013/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT|
YEAR JZOOS-ZOLO & JOLO-ZOLL. PRAYING TO: 1. FORMULATE THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. 2. ALLOW THE)APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT,/BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1009, 1010, 1012 & 1013/BANG/2012DATED:04/10/2013 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE.COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE [INCOMETAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) WARD-1(1), BANGALORE.|
THESE ITAs COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,DEVDAS J"7|DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Tne learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue brings to.the notice of this Court a Circular bearing No.17 of 2019 datedO8[9.]August, 2019 wherein the further ennancement of monetary|limit for filing of appeals by the Departments before the Income-Tax Appeliate Tribunals, High Courts and Special LeavePetitions/Appeals before the Supreme Court stands amended,and by the said amendment the earlier monetary limit ofRs.50,00,000/- (Rupees fifty lakh) has not been raised toRs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees one crore). The earlier monetary limitwas prescribed as per Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[9.]July,2018. In the light of the same, the learned counsel submits that|tnese appeals are not maintainable and in view of the Circular,|tnese appeals may be permitted to be withdrawn. Further, the|jearned counsel would also draw the attention of this Court to
Clause 10 of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[9.]July, 2018wherein certain exceptions are carved out. The learned counselsubmits that at the present stage it may not be possible for himto submit wnetner the matter falis Under any of the exceptions. |Therefore, it is prayed that liberty may be reserved to theappellants to move tnis Court, if it is found that the matter fallswithin the exception carved out in Clause 10 of Circular bearingNumber 3 of 2018.
2. On the query of the Court as to wnether the Circular is |applicable to pending matters, the learned counsel draws theattention of this Court to the communication dated 20[9.]AUGUST,2019 made by the Central Board of Direct Taxation to all theChief Commissioners of Income Tax clarifying at paragrapn No.3that the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.17 of 2019 isapplicable to all pending Special Leave Petitions, Appeals, CrossObjections and References.
3. In view of the above, we permit the appellants to)withdraw these appeals for the reasons stated above. Liberty isalso granted to the appellants to seek revival of these appeals, if
=9�=,�86734�9.19�9./�A199/2�8100,�@=9.=3�9./�/C5/:9=63�512;/4�679�=3�
�017,/����68��=257012�</12=3>��6�*�68����+�
033�
�"�#�� �!��
�"�#�� �!��
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.