Case LawHigh Court › Ita/137/2000 Of M/S.kerala Kala Theatre...

Ita/137/2000 Of M/S.kerala Kala Theatre v. The Commissioner Of Incometax, Calicut

High Court 10 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/137/2000 Of M/S.kerala Kala Theatre v. The Commissioner Of Incometax, Calicut
Date of order
10 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/137/2000 Of M/S.kerala Kala Theatre v. The Commissioner Of Incometax, Calicut, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the above circumstances, we allow the appeal, vacating the order ofthe Tribunal and directing the officer to allow the claim, if the same wasallowed for the previous assessment year.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2008 / 20TH POUSHA 1929 ITA.No. 137 of 2000() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23/08/1999 IN COCH. IN ITA.803/1995 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT : ----------------- M/S. KERALA KALA THEATRE, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR SRI.DALE P.KURIEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SR.COUNSEL FOR IT SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. Ramachandran Nair &T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I.T.A.NO.137 of 2000 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 10[th] day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J. This appeal is filed challenging disallowance of the lease rent paid forthe theatre building on the ground that payment is after the expiry of thelease period. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the issuearose for the previous assessment year, i.e., 1989-90, wherein the matter,after remand by the Tribunal, was allowed by the assessing authority. Thedecision is stated to be accepted by the department, in as much as there is noproceedings initiated under Section 263 of the Act by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax. In the above circumstances, we allow the appeal, vacating the order ofthe Tribunal and directing the officer to allow the claim, if the same wasallowed for the previous assessment year. (C.N. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) -2- C.N. Ramachandran Nair & & T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I.T.A. No.137 of 2000- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT 10[th] January, 2008.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan