Ita/137/2008 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.thrissur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
24 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/137/2008 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.thrissur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/137/2008 Of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.thrissur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
THURSDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1932
ITA.No. 137 of 2008()
--------------------- ....................
ITA.284/(COCH) 2006 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN.
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE :
---------------------------------------
THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD, ST.MARYS
COLLEGE ROAD, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.K.VINOD CHANDRAN
SRI.K.P.ABDUL AZEEZ
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEPARTMENT:
--------------------------------------------------
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 1 (1),RANGE-I,TRICHUR.
ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX FOR R
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 24/02/2011, ALONG WITH ITA NOS. 38 & 39 OF 2010,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I.T.A. Nos. 137/2008 & 38 & 39 of 2010
= = = = = = = = = = = == == = = = =
DATED THIS, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011.
J U D G M E N T
C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J.
The sole question raised is on the method of valuation of security byapplying the Yield to Maturity method in terms of the Reserve Bank ofIndia guidelines, which is decided in favour of the appellant vide judgmentin the case of another assessee in ITA 234 of 2009. Following the saidjudgment, we allow all these appeals by reversing the order of the tribunaland that of the lower authorities to the extent those decisions are contraryto our judgment above and by directing the assessing officer to revise theassessments based on the judgment above stated.
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,N,(JUDGE)
knc/-
P.S. GOPINATHAN, (JUDGE)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.