Ita/137/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Kent Constructions Pvt Ltd
High Court
01 Jun 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/137/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Kent Constructions Pvt Ltd
Date of order
01 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/137/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Kent Constructions Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
TUESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2010 / 11TH JYAISTHA 1932
ITA.No. 137 of 2010()
---------------------
ITA.232/COCH'209/2009 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELANT/RESPONDENT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS),
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/ APPELLANT
------------------------
M/S.KENT CONSTRUCTIONS PVT.LTD,
ERNAKULAM.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 01/06/2010 ALONG WITH I.T.A No.110 OF 2010, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.
---------------------------
I.T.A Nos. 110 & 137 OF 2010
--------------------------
Dated this the 1[st ]day of June, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Following the judgment in I.T.Appeal No.71 of 2010, wedismiss these I.T.Appeals.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
(JUDGE )
vps
P.S.GOPINATHAN
(JUDGE )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.