Case Law › High Court › Ita/137/2012 Of M/S.thirumbadi Rubber Co...

Ita/137/2012 Of M/S.thirumbadi Rubber Company Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 08 Nov 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

08 Nov 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/137/2012 Of M/S.thirumbadi Rubber Company Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: This appeal is dismissed in view of the judgment dated27.6.2011 in I.T.A.No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/17TH KARTHIKA, 1935 ITA.No. 137 of 2012 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 1203/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH APPELLANT(S): ------------- M/S.THIRUMBADI RUBBER COMPANY LTD., 234-A, RACE COURSE ROAD, COIMBATORE - 18. BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAGHUNATH SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON08-11-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J. ---------------------------------------------- I.T.A.No. 137 of 2012 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8[th] November, 2013JUDGMENT Manjula Chellur, C.J. This appeal is dismissed in view of the judgment dated27.6.2011 in I.T.A.No. 15 of 2010 and connected cases. MANJULA CHELLUR, CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE vgs8.11

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.