Ita/137/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Ester Industries Ltd
High Court
21 Feb 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/137/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Ester Industries Ltd
Date of order
21 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/137/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Ester Industries Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The applications and appeals are accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~4&6*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ITA 137/2017 & CM Nos.4934-35/2017+ITA 139/2017 & CM No.4937/2017
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-iy
Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.Versus
M/S ESTER INDUSTRIES LTD.
Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDlRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
ORDER21.02.2017
%
At the outset, the Court notices that both appeals are grossly timebarred by 860 days; which is the time taken by the Revenue to re-file theappeals. In both instances, the explanation for the delay is less thenconvincing; the Revenue states the heavy workload of appellant, which itunable to effectively manage as well as the lack of manpower. The otherreason stated is the reorganization of its panel counsels. Both did notconstitute "sufficient cause" to enable the Court to condone the delay.
The applications and appeals are accordingly dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT,
J.
FEBRUARY 21,2017
sb
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedBy:AMULYA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.