Ita/137/2019 Of Joseph Mattam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/137/2019 Of Joseph Mattam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/137/2019 Of Joseph Mattam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942
ITA.No.137 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 508/2014 DATED 16-10-2015 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
APPELLANT/S:
JOSEPH MATTAMAGED 54 YEARSMATTATHIL GRANITE METALS,KODASSERY, CHETTIKULAM,THRISSUR-680725.
BY ADVS.SRI.MOHAN PULIKKALSRI.NARAYANAN P POTTY
RESPONDENT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHRISSUR-680001.
R1 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAXR1 BY SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.02.2021, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 17th day of February 2021
S.V. Bhatti, J.
Assessee is the appellant. The instant appeal was filedwith a delay of 1138 days and the assessee in C.M. ApplicationNo.2/2019 prayed for condoning the said delay. On 11.11.2019,this Court condoned the delay subject to condition that theassessee/appellant deposits Rs.25,000/- with the Departmentand pays a further sum of Rs.25,000/- to the Kerala State LegalServices Authority.
2.The appeal is taken up for admission. Advocate
Mohan Pulickkal informs the Court that the conditions imposedby the Court are not complied with.
I.T.A. No.137/2019
We are of the view that, consequently, the delay is notcondoned and the appeal fails. For the reasons indicated above,the I.T.A. is dismissed.
Sd/-S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE
jjj
I.T.A. No.137/2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26.03.2013
ANNEXURETRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.09.2014 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-V,KOCHI IN ITA NO.20/TCR/CIT(A)-V/2013-14.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-V,KOCHI IN ITA NO.20/TCR/CIT(A)-V/2013-14.
ANNEXURE CCERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.10.2015 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCHIN ITA NO.508/COCH/2014.THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCHIN ITA NO.508/COCH/2014.
ANNEXURE DTRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.4226.2009 DATED 30.12.2009.30.12.2009.
ANNEXURE ETRUE COPY OF THE SUB STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS ISSUED BY SOUTH INDIAN BANK FOR THE PERIOD 01.04.2009 TO 31.03.2010.ISSUED BY SOUTH INDIAN BANK FOR THE PERIOD 01.04.2009 TO 31.03.2010.
ANNEXURE FTRUE COPY OF THE OVERDRAFT STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS ISSUED BY SOUTH INDIAN BANK FOR THE PERIOD 01.04.2009 TO 31.03.2010ACCOUNTS ISSUED BY SOUTH INDIAN BANK FOR THE PERIOD 01.04.2009 TO 31.03.2010
ANNEXURE GTRUE COPY OF THE SB STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF BINDU JOSEPH FOR THE PERIOD 01.04.2009 TO 31.03.2010.BINDU JOSEPH FOR THE PERIOD 01.04.2009 TO 31.03.2010.
ANNEXURE HMEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 04.04.2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.