Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1374/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1374/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri S.ratnam Pillai

High Court 25 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1374/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri S.ratnam Pillai
Date of order
25 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/1374/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri S.ratnam Pillai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since no substantialquestion of law arises from the order of the Tribunal, we dismiss boththe appeals filed by the revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 3RD ASWINA 1931 ITA.No. 1374 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.857/COCH/1993 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SHRI.S.RATNAM PILLAI, C/O.BRILLIANT EXPORTS, COCHIN-06. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/09/2009, ALONG WITH ITA 1395 OF 2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 1374 & 1395 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard standing counsel for the appellant. On going through theappellate orders and after hearing standing counsel for the appellant wefind that the questions raised pertain to part disallowance of inflatedpurchases, deletion of certain additions, etc. All the questions raisedpertain to findings of fact of the Tribunal. Since no substantialquestion of law arises from the order of the Tribunal, we dismiss boththe appeals filed by the revenue. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan