Ita/1383/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Choice Trading Corporation (P)Ltd
High Court
19 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1383/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Choice Trading Corporation (P)Ltd
Date of order
19 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1383/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Choice Trading Corporation (P)Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2009 / 28TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 1383 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.743/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
-----------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
CHOICE TRADING CORPORATION (P)LTD.,
KUMBALAM, KOCHI.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 19/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No.1383 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 19th day of August, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since the issue raised is covered against the revenue by our
decision in I.T.A.Nos. 3 to 6 of 2008, following the said judgment wedismiss this appeal. Registry will attach a copy of the judgment in theabove cases to form part of this judgment.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(C. K. ABDUL REHIM)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.