Case LawHigh Court › Ita/141/2017 Of M/S. Maruthi Buildtech (...

Ita/141/2017 Of M/S. Maruthi Buildtech (P) Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 16 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/141/2017 Of M/S. Maruthi Buildtech (P) Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/141/2017 Of M/S. Maruthi Buildtech (P) Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the aforementioned reasons, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY I.T.A. NO.141 OF 2017 BETWEEN: M/S. MARUTHI BUILDTECH (P) LTD., (PRESENTLY KNOWN AS M/S. DOMINIONS REALTY (P) LTD.,) REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI.SURESH JAIN, #26, REST HOUSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), QUEENS ROAD, C.R. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 03.11.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.17/BANG/2010 PRAYING TO; (a) FORMULATE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT. (b) TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST WHICH IS AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.17/BANG/2010 DATED 03.11.2016 (ANNEXURE-A); (c) TO PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.A.Shankar, learned senior counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned senior counsel for the assessee has filed a memo in which it is stated that the assessee has filed a miscellaneous petition before the Tribunal and the Tribunal vide order dated 15.03.2017 has recalled the order dated 03.11.2016 for adjudication on the additional ground. 2. Therefore, in view of the order dated 15.03.2017, the issue involved in this appeal has been rendered academic. 3. Learned senior counsel for the assesee seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises. 4. In view of the aforementioned reasons, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan