Ita/1421/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.enkays
High Court
09 Dec 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1421/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.enkays
Date of order
09 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1421/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.enkays, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We do not find anything to interfere with theorder of the Tribunal cancelling the addition.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2009 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1931
ITA.No. 1421 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.1160/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
M/S.ENKAYS, C/O. SHRI.N.K.SIVADASAN,
PARTNER, CHEERIPARAMBIL, VATTUKUNNU,
MULANTHURUTHY, COCHIN.
ADV. M/S..T.M.SREEDHARAN
V.P.NARAYANAN &
C.K.SHERIN
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 09/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
----------------------------------------
I.T.A. No.1421 OF 2009
----------------------------------------
Dated, the 9[th] day of December, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The question raised in the Departmental appeal iswhether the Tribunal was justified in cancelling theaddition of Rs.12,91,840/- made in the assessment beingthe value of sales suppression detected by the sales taxauthorities.
2. We have heard the counsel appearing for bothsides.
3. On going through the orders, we find that theDepartment treated the estimated turnover assessed bysales Tax Authorities as undisclosed income of theassessee. It is the finding of the Tribunal that thisturnover cannot be treated as undisclosed income of theassessee. We are of the view that at the maximum netincome could be estimated from the turnover.
Considering the total turnover income involved, that is,Rs.12 lakhs, the assessee may not have tax liability onthe net income. According to the assessee, the businessled to loss and the assessee has therefore abandoned thebusiness. We do not find anything to interfere with theorder of the Tribunal cancelling the addition.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE
V.K.MOHANAN,
JUDGE
kvm/-
-:3:-
V.K.MOHANAN, J.
O.P.No.
JUDGMENT
Dated:..
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.