Case Law › High Court › Ita/142/1995 Of The Commr. Of Income-Tax...

Ita/142/1995 Of The Commr. Of Income-Tax B.c.-Iv v. M/S. A.c.c.ltd

High Court 23 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

23 Apr 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ita/142/1995 Of The Commr. Of Income-Tax B.c.-Iv v. M/S. A.c.c.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 1995 INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 1995 The Commissioner of Income-tax, B.C.-IV. ... Applicant. V/s. M/s.A.C.C. Limited. ... Respondent. Mr A. S. Rao for the applicant. Mr A. K. Jasani for the respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 23rd April 2007. DATED : 23rd April 2007. DATED : 23rd April 2007. P.C. :---- P.C. : ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the affidavit of the Commissioner of Income-tax-1, Mumbai and also the affidavit of Arvind Inamdar, Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax-1, Mumbai. The explanation given therein is accepted. However, the earlier order dated 20th March, 2007 is modified to the extent it levy costs of Rs. 5,000/-. The appellant is permitted only to claim refund thereof. 2. It is made clear that in future the concerned Officers should take necessary precaution to ensure that in every matter the respondent is served properly and affidavit of service is filed. 3. Oral motion stands disposed of. No order as to costs.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.