Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1431/2009 Of The Commr. Of Income Ta...

Ita/1431/2009 Of The Commr. Of Income Tax v. M/S.e.v.mathai

High Court 08 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1431/2009 Of The Commr. Of Income Tax v. M/S.e.v.mathai
Date of order
08 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1431/2009 Of The Commr. Of Income Tax v. M/S.e.v.mathai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal on account of the taxamount below the monetary limit for filing appeal to Tribunal under thenorms of Central Board of Direct Taxes, we do not find anyjustification to entertain the appeal against the said order.Consequently the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 17TH BHADRA 1931 ITA.No. 1431 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.801/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- M/S.E.V.MATHAI 7 SONS(P)LTD, KOTHAMANGALAM. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K. MOHANAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 1431 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal on account of the taxamount below the monetary limit for filing appeal to Tribunal under thenorms of Central Board of Direct Taxes, we do not find anyjustification to entertain the appeal against the said order.Consequently the appeal is dismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan