Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1445/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1445/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Cotholic Syrian Bank Ltd

High Court 26 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1445/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Cotholic Syrian Bank Ltd
Date of order
26 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/1445/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Cotholic Syrian Bank Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently the appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2009 / 4TH BHADRA 1931 ITA.No. 1445 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.5/1999 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT(S):RESPONDENT: --------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT: -------------------------------- THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD., TRICHUR. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/08/2009, ALONG WITH ITA.1457 OF 2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ---------------------------------- I.T.A. No.1445 And 1457 of 2009 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 26[th] day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T---------------------- Ramachandran Nair,J. The question raised in the departmental appealspertains to department's claim for assessment of interestreceived on securities, bonds, debentures, etc. under the InterestTax Act. The Tribunal found that none of these investments canbe termed as loan or advance warranting assessment for theincome under the Interest Tax Act. Since interest on loans oradvances only will attract liability under the Interest Tax Act weare of the view that the Tribunal rightly rejected thedepartment's claim. Consequently the appeals are dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan