Ita/1445/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Cotholic Syrian Bank Ltd
High Court
26 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1445/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Cotholic Syrian Bank Ltd
Date of order
26 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1445/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Cotholic Syrian Bank Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently the appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2009 / 4TH BHADRA 1931
ITA.No. 1445 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.5/1999 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT(S):RESPONDENT:
---------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT:
--------------------------------
THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD.,
TRICHUR.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 26/08/2009, ALONG WITH ITA.1457 OF 2009 THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
----------------------------------
I.T.A. No.1445 And 1457 of 2009
----------------------------------
Dated this the 26[th] day of August, 2009
J U D G M E N T----------------------
Ramachandran Nair,J.
The question raised in the departmental appealspertains to department's claim for assessment of interestreceived on securities, bonds, debentures, etc. under the InterestTax Act. The Tribunal found that none of these investments canbe termed as loan or advance warranting assessment for theincome under the Interest Tax Act. Since interest on loans oradvances only will attract liability under the Interest Tax Act weare of the view that the Tribunal rightly rejected thedepartment's claim. Consequently the appeals are dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.