Ita/1470/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Management Development Institute
High Court
03 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/1470/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Management Development Institute
Date of order
03 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1470/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Management Development Institute, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
o/o O3.O2.2OLL
Present: Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, [Sr. ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][the]appellant/Revenue.Mr. Ajay Vohra, Advocate [with ][Ms. ][Kavita ]Jha [and ][Mr.]Somnath Shukla, Advocates [for ][the ][respondent/assessee.]
+ trA L431/2010 & ITA 1470/2010
(Common orders)
The issue raised in these appeals [stand ][covered against ][the]Revenue in the assessee'S case' only [which ][pertains ][to ][earlier]t'assessment years. The [question ]respect of [allowing exemption ][under]Section 11 & L2 of the lncome-Tax Act [was decided ][by ][the ][Tribunal]and appeal preferred by the Revenue thereagainst [i.e. ] [5561200G]was dismissed on 16th November, 2006 on [the ][ground ][that ][no]substantial [question ]of law arises. Other [questions ][of law ][were]Idecided in ITA 93O\2OO9 & 589/2008 [on ][27rh ])u|y,2010.
Following those [judgments, ]these appeals [are ][disposed ][of]
holding that no substantial [question ]of law [arises.]
(_L
FEBRUARY 03, 2011
skb-
Z-Y04.M.L. MEHTA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue