Case LawHigh Court › Ita/147/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/147/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri T Krishnamurthy

High Court 05 Apr 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/147/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri T Krishnamurthy
Date of order
05 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/147/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri T Krishnamurthy, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in case occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF APRIL, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL I.T.A. No. 147/2012 BETWEEN : -------------- 1. The Commissioner of Income Tax C.R. Building Queens Road Bangalore. 2. The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle – 2(1) C.R. Building Queens Road Bangalore. … APPELLANTS (By Sri. K.V. Aravind, Adv.,) AND : ------- Sri. T. Krishnamurthy Since deceased represented by his L/R Smt. N. Shashikala No. 54, Timber Yard Layout Mysore Road Bangalore. … RESPONDENT (By Sri. S. Annamalai, Adv., for Sri. M. Lava, Adv.) --- This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act 1961 with a prayer to set aside the order dated 20.01.2012 passed by the ITAT, Bangalore in IT(SS)A No. 2/Bang/2010 confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner and etc. This I.T.A. coming on for Final Hearing this day, ALOK ARADHE J, delivered the following; J U D G M E N T Sri. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Sri. S. Annamalai, learned counsel for the assessee. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo stating that the dispute involved in the appeal has been settled under the Vivad-se-Vishwas scheme. 2. The aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the assessee is taken on record. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the revenue seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in case occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE. Sd/- JUDGE. LRS.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan