Ita v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
02 Jul 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeal, in case if need so arises in future.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
I.T.A. NO.147 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
M/S SRINAGARA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY SRI. SHAMBAVAIAH, NO.36-2/48, SAPTHASRI, 15 MAIN ROAD, SRI. RAMANJANEYA STREET, SRINAGAR, BENGALURU. PAN: .
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. BHAIRAV KUTTAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
AND:THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(4), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 15.10.2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.2603 & 2604/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 AND 2014-15 AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Memo filed by learned counsel for the appellant is
accepted.
2. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
to file fresh appeal, in case if need so arises in future.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
hnm
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.