Ita/1492/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gaylord Constructions, Angamaly
High Court
21 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1492/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gaylord Constructions, Angamaly
Date of order
21 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1492/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gaylord Constructions, Angamaly, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 1255 of 2009, we dismiss this appeal also filed by the department.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
& THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2009 / 30TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 1492 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.181/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
-----------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
GAYLORD CONSTRUCTIONS,
KACHAPPILLY HOUSE, NAZARET ROAD, ANGAMALY.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ON 21/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 1492 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of August, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Following the judgment in I.T.A.No. 1255 of 2009, we dismiss
this appeal also filed by the department. Registry will attach a copy ofthe judgment in the above case to form part of this judgment.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(C. K. ABDUL REHIM)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue