Case LawHigh Court › Ita/151/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/151/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Midas Polymer Compounds Pvt.ltd

High Court 11 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/151/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Midas Polymer Compounds Pvt.ltd
Date of order
11 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/151/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Midas Polymer Compounds Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The very samequestion, whether the assessee is entitled todeduction in respect of the aforesaid income undersection 80IB pertaining to the assessment year 2003-04, has already been decided by a Full Bench of thisCourt in ITA.84/09.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014/20TH SRAVANA, 1936 ITA.No. 151 of 2014 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 665/2013 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 17-01-2014 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: ---------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: ---------------------------------------------------- M/S. MIDAS POLYMER COMPOUNDS PVT.LTD. MIDAS MARKETING BUILDING, MARIATHURUTHU P O KOTTAYAM-686027 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11-08-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ. ----------------------------------- I.T.A.No.151 of 2014 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 11[th] day of August, 2014JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. The issue raised in this appeal is regarding theliability to pay income tax on the income earned bythe assessee by way of 'mixing charges', pertainingto the assessment year 2008-09. The very samequestion, whether the assessee is entitled todeduction in respect of the aforesaid income undersection 80IB pertaining to the assessment year 2003-04, has already been decided by a Full Bench of thisCourt in ITA.84/09. In such circumstances, the issuecanvassed by the department in this appeal standsfully covered in favour of the assessee. Therefore,this appeal does not merit admission. It isdismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, Judge./TRUE COPY/ kkb. PS TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan