Ita/15/2002 Of Investors Club Trichur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin
High Court
24 Jun 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/15/2002 Of Investors Club Trichur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin
Date of order
24 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/15/2002 Of Investors Club Trichur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2008 / 3RD ASHADHA 1930
ITA.No. 15 of 2002()
--------------------
ITA.388/COCH/1995 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT - ASSESSEE
------------------------------------------------
INVESTORS CLUB TRICHUR, MAHATHMA PRESS
BUILDING, PALACE ROAD, THRISSUR,
KERALA - 680020 REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY, SRI.K.O.JOSE, S/O.OUSEPH,
AGED 41 YEARS.
BY ADV. SRI.M.UNNIKRISHNA MENON
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT - REVENUE
---------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SR.COUNSEL FOR IT FOR R
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT FOR R
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 24/06/2008, ALONG WITH ITA 19 OF 2002
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K. MOHANAN, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. Nos. 15 & 19 OF 2002
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of June, 2008
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair,J.
Since the question raised is covered against the assessee bydecision of this Court in assessee's own case in ITA 194 of 2001, wedismiss these two appeals following the above judgment.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
(V. K. MOHANAN)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.