Case LawHigh Court › Ita/15/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/15/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Bhopal v. M/S Shree Vignesh Warehouse And Distributors Pv.t Ltd

High Court 24 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Ita/15/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Bhopal v. M/S Shree Vignesh Warehouse And Distributors Pv.t Ltd
Date of order
24 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/15/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Bhopal v. M/S Shree Vignesh Warehouse And Distributors Pv.t Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: With the aforesaid, this appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA-15-16-18-20-21-26-39-40/2015 24-01-2017 Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, learned counsel for therespondents. This is the appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260-Aof the Income Tax Act calling in question the tenability of theorder passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for variousassessment years. Except for difference in the years ofassessment, the question involved in this appeal stands answeredby this Court in the appeal filed under Section 260-A by therevenue (Appeal) in the case of coassessee Dr. Yogiraj Sharma inITA No.52/2015, wherein, similar appeals of the revenue havebeen rejected by this Court on 29th of March, 2016 and in ITANos.29-31-34-36-41-42/2015 & ITA No.43/2015 decided by acommon order on 2.8.2016, where the appeals filed by anotherco-assessees, Shri Gaurav Sharma & Ors. have been rejected. Inview of the order already passed in the appeals filed underSection 260-A of the Income Tax Act on 2.8.2016 and on29.3.2016, we see no reason to make any further indulgence intothe matter and for the grounds and reasons already indicated inthe orders passed on 2.8.2016 & 29.3.2016, this appeal filed bythe revenue fails. With the aforesaid, this appeal stands dismissed. (RAJENDRA MENON)ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (H.P. SINGH)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan