Case Law › High Court › Ita v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income...

Ita v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 26 Sep 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

26 Sep 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017/4TH ASWINA, 1939 ITA.No. 153 of 2012 ----------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 102/2010 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 29-03-2012----- APPELLANT/RESPONDENT IN ITA:------------------------------------- M/S.KUTTUKARAN FOUNDATIONS, SANJUAN TOWERS, OLDRAILWAY STATION ROAD ERNAKULAM 682018 BY ADV. SMT.K.LATHA RESPONDENT/APPELLANT IN ITA:------------------------------------- THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 2 ERNAKULAM 682018. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-09-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & ANU SIVARAMAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------I. T. A. No.153 of 2012 ------------------------------------------------Dated this the 26[th ]day of September, 2017 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. 1. aLearned counsel for the appellant seeks towithdraw the appeal. 2. In view of the submission so made, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC Sd/- JUDGE ANU SIVARAMAN kns/- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.