Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1535/2009 Of A.h.aboobacker v. The A...

Ita/1535/2009 Of A.h.aboobacker v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 07 Oct 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1535/2009 Of A.h.aboobacker v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/1535/2009 Of A.h.aboobacker v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: Inthe circumstances, we feel the assessee should be given an opportunitybefore the Tribunal to engage counsel and argue the matter.Consequently, we allow the appeal by setting aside the order of theTribunal and restore the appeal and cross-objection to it's file.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2009 / 15TH ASWINA 1931 ITA.No. 1535 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.23/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- A.H.ABOOBACKER, MALABAR ENTERPRISES, WADAKKANCHERY, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME --------------- TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)M TRICHUR. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Appeal is filed against Annexure G order of the Tribunalallowing departmental appeal and simultaneously dismissing the cross-objection filed by the assessee. It is seen from the Tribunal's order thatthe matter is disposed of without hearing the assessee on account ofabsence of counsel. Senior counsel Sri. P. Balachandran was engagedin the matter before the Tribunal and unfortunately he is no more. Inthe circumstances, we feel the assessee should be given an opportunitybefore the Tribunal to engage counsel and argue the matter.Consequently, we allow the appeal by setting aside the order of theTribunal and restore the appeal and cross-objection to it's file. Sincethe matter is old, there will be direction to the Tribunal to dispose ofthe appeal and cross-objection afresh after hearing the assessee'scounsel also within a period of three months from the date ofproduction of a copy of this judgment by the appellant. Appellant will along with a copy of this judgment produce vakkalath of counselengaged in the matter for the Tribunal to issue notice to him. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan