Ita/1538/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm v. Muraleedharan Pillai B
High Court
26 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1538/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm v. Muraleedharan Pillai B
Date of order
26 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1538/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm v. Muraleedharan Pillai B, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and latest circular, we areof the view that the appeal is not maintenable, hence is dismissed. sd/- S.V.BHATTI Judge css/ sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS Judge APPENDIX APPELLANT'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE-ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSINGOFFICER DATED 29.3.2006 AN...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 26 DAY OF JULY 2021 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1943
ITA NO. 1538 OF 2009
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 129/2007 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TVM.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT:
MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI B.SOORANADU, KOLLAM.
BY ADV SRI.S.ARUN RAJ
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON26.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
S.V.Bhatti, J.
The Revenue is the appellant in the instant appeal.
2. Heard learned Standing counsel Sri Jose Joseph for the appellant and Adv.S.Arunraj for respondent.
3. The value in the appeal is less than the limit prescribed by CBDT vCircular. The Supreme Court in the judgment reported in S.C.Naregal
Commissioner of Income Tax (2019) 418 ITR 455 (SC) has considered theeffect of CBDT Circular and dismissed the appeal coming within thepurport of CBDT Circular.
4. The valuation of the subject appeal, since is less than the limitstipulated by CBDT Circular, and also the judgment of Apex Court inS.C.Naregal (supra) is applicable to the appeal.
Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and latest circular, we areof the view that the appeal is not maintenable, hence is dismissed.
sd/- S.V.BHATTI
Judge
css/
sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS Judge
APPENDIX
APPELLANT'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE-ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSINGOFFICER DATED 29.3.2006
ANNEXURE-BTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 17.11.2006.
ANNEXURE-CTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 24.8.2007.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.