Case LawHigh Court › Ita/154/2017 Of M/S Srinidhi Gold v. The...

Ita/154/2017 Of M/S Srinidhi Gold v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 10 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/154/2017 Of M/S Srinidhi Gold v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/154/2017 Of M/S Srinidhi Gold v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY I.T.A. NO.154 OF 2017 BETWEEN: M/S SRINIDHI GOLD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI. JAGANNATH S. SHETTY, NO.1 & 2, MUNICIPAL COMPLEX, V.V.ROAD, MAHAVEER CIRCLE, MANDYA-571401. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) AND: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CAUVERY PARK ROAD, MANDYA-571401. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 11.11.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.494/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 PRAYING TO; (a) FORMULATE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT. (b) TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU ‘C’ BENCH, IN ITA NO.494/Bang/2012 DATED 11.11.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 (ANNEXURE-A) (c) TO PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr. K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Mr. A.Shankar, learned senior counsel for Mr. M.Lavalearned counsel for the assessee. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee has approached under the 'Vivad se Vishwas' scheme and Form 3 under the scheme has been issued. He, therefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal and has filed a memo in this regard. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE GH
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan