Ita/156/2002 Of M/S.queens Wines v. Asst.commr Of Incometax
High Court
28 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/156/2002 Of M/S.queens Wines v. Asst.commr Of Incometax
Date of order
28 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/156/2002 Of M/S.queens Wines v. Asst.commr Of Incometax, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1929
ITA.No. 156 of 2002()
---------------------
ITA.142/COCH/1998 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
----------------------------------------------------
M/S.QUEENS WINES,REPRESENTED BY PARTNER
SRI.N.LAKSHMANAN,VADAKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.BALACHANDRAN
SMT.PREETHA S.NAIR
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT
---------------------------------------
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE,CALICUT.
BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 28/02/2008, ALONG WITH ITA NO. 160 OF 2002
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 156 & 160 OF 2002
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 28th day of February, 2008
JUDGMENT
C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J.
We find the questions raised in both the appeals pertaining toestimation of income after rejection of books of accounts are purequestions of fact. Since our jurisdiction is confined to interference withthe decision of the Tribunal on substantial questions of law, we dismissthe appeals.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.