Ita/157/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd
High Court
31 May 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/157/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
31 May 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/157/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31 DAY OF MAY 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
BETWEEN:
I.T.A. NO.157 OF 2007
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, RASTROTHANA BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE.
2. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, WARD-19(1), RASTROTHANA BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S INTEL TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT. LTD., NO.136, AIRPORT ROAD, BANGALORE-17.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE A/W MS. MANASA, ADVOCATE)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 26.04.2006 PASSED IN ITA NO.972/BANG/2004 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2003-04, PRAYING TO:
(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN.
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE, IN ITA NO.972/BANG/2004 DATED 26.04.2006 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL WARD-19(1), BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
TAXATION,
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the Revenue.
Mr. T. Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee.
2. The learned counsel for the assessee submits
that the assessee has availed the benefit of “Vivad Se Vishwas’ scheme and along with the memo, true copy of Form-3 has been produced. It is therefore submitted that the appeal may be disposed of.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the learned counsel for the revenue seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to revive the same if occasion so arises.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
HR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.