Case LawHigh Court › Ita/157/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/157/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Deepak Cables (I) Ltd

High Court 29 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/157/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Deepak Cables (I) Ltd
Date of order
29 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/157/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Deepak Cables (I) Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Issue: Tne learned counsel submitsthat at the present stage it may not be possible for him toSubmit whether the matter falls under any of the exceptions. |Therefore, it is prayed that liberty may be reserved to theappellants to move this Court, if it is found that the matter fallswithin the exception carve...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29 DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS| INCOME TAX APPEAL No.157/2010 BETWEEN: 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, | C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. 2).The DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND K.V. AND SRI DILIP M., ADVOCATES) AND: DEEPAK CABLES (I) LTD.,NO.313, EMBASSY CENTRE,( FLOOR, CRESCENT ROAD,|BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENT (BY S.R. ANURADHA, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS. FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDERDATED 27.11.2009 PASSED IN ITA NO.689/BANG/2008, FOR THE|ASSESSMENTYEAR2001-2002,PRAYING TO".iFORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATEDTHEREIN; II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERSPASSED|BYTHE|INCOME-TAXAPPELLAIETRIBUNAL,BANGALORE IN ITA NO. 689/BANG/2008, DATED 27.11.2009CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONERANDCONFIRMTHE|ORDER.PASSED|BYTHE|DEPU I COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1),BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, | DEVDAS J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue brings totne notice of this Court a Circular bearing No.1/7 of 2019 datedO8[9#]August, 2019 wherein the further enhancement of monetary|limit for filing of appeals by the Departments before the Income-Tax Appeliate Tribunals, High Courts and Special LeavePetitions/Appeals before the Supreme Court stands amended,and by the said amendment the earlier monetary limit ofRs.50,00,000/- (Rupees fifty lakh) has not been raised toRs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees one crore). The earlier monetary limitwas prescribed as per Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[9#]July,2018. In the light of the same, the learned counsel submits that|tne appeal is not maintainable and in view of the Circular, the| appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn. Further, the learnedcounsel would aliso draw the attention of tnis Court to Clause 10of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[9#]July, 2018 wherein|certain exceptions are carved out. Tne learned counsel submitsthat at the present stage it may not be possible for him toSubmit whether the matter falls under any of the exceptions. |Therefore, it is prayed that liberty may be reserved to theappellants to move this Court, if it is found that the matter fallswithin the exception carved out in Clause 10 of Circular bearingNumber 3 of 2018. 2. On the query of the Court as to wnether the Circular is |applicable to pending matters, the learned counsel draws theattention of this Court to the communication dated 20[9#]AUGUST,2019 made by the Central Board of Direct Taxation to all theChief Commissioners of Income Tax clarifying at paragrapn No.3that the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.17 of 2019 isapplicable to all pending Special Leave Petitions, Appeals, CrossObjections and References. 3. In view of the above, we permit the appellant towithdraw tne appeal for the reasons stated above. Liberty isalso granted to the appellant to seek revival of this appeal, if it isfound tnat the matter falls within the exception carved out inClause 10 of Circular bearing No.3 of 2018. BvkK/- Sd/-—JUDGE Sd/-—JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan