Ita/157/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Income Tax v. M/S Keezhedath Traders
High Court
14 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/157/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Income Tax v. M/S Keezhedath Traders
Date of order
14 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/157/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Income Tax v. M/S Keezhedath Traders, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 23RD KARTHIKA, 1941
ITA.No.157 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 299/COCH/2014 DATED 15-06-2016 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX,KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS.SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTSRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE:
M/S KEEZHEDATH TRADERSTHAZHEPALAM, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIRR1 BY ADV. SRI.ASISH MOHANR1 BY ADV. SRI.P.JINISH PAULR1 BY ADV. SRI.G.KRISHNAKUMAR MALLYAR1 BY ADV. KUM.MEKHALA M.BENNYR1 BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEJITH
R1 BY ADV. SRI.G.KRISHNAKUMAR MALLYA
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON14.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J. &AMIT RAWAL, J.
-------------------------------------------------
I.T. Appeal No. 157 OF 2016
-------------------------------------------------
DATED THIS THE 14[th] DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
J U D G M E N T
Abdul Rehim, J.:
Standing counsel for Government of India (Taxes) had filedmemo praying for withdrawal of the appeal, based on the latestlitigation policy declared by the Income Tax Department.
2.Permission is granted. The above appeal is herebydismissed as withdrawn.
3.The Registry shall take appropriate decision withrespect to refund of court fee as per the provisions contained inthe relevant statute.
Sd/-
C.K.ABDUL REHIM
JUDGE
AMG
Sd/-
AMIT RAWALJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 24.12.2008.
ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 25.4.2014 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS).PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS).
ANNEXURE CTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.6.2016 PASSED BY THEINCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.