Case LawHigh Court › Ita/157/2024 Of Shri Rahul v. Income Tax...

Ita/157/2024 Of Shri Rahul v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 22 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/157/2024 Of Shri Rahul v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2017-2018
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/157/2024 Of Shri Rahul v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned bySHARADAVANI BLocation:HIGH COURTOFKARNATAKA NC: 2025:KHC:2579-DB ITA No. 157 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 157 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SHRI. RAHUL, UDAYASHANKAR, REP BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI. C UDAYASHANKAR, 851-C, 17 G MAIN, 5 BLOCK, RAJAINAGAR, BENGALURU 560 010. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANNAMALAI S.,ADVOCATE) AND: INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTL TAXATION WARD 2(1), BENGAURU, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FT ROAD, 6 BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU 560 095. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.SANMATHI E I.,ADVOCATE) THIS ITA/ INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10.01.2024 PASSED IN ITA NO.869/BANG/2023, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-2018. PRAYING TO 1.TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND 2.TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE SMC-A BENCH, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.869/BANG/2023 DATED 10.01.2024 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-2018 AND ETC., THIS ITA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL JUDGEMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Learned counsel for the appellant has moved a Memo seeking leave of the court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to come back to the court if the circumstances warrant again. Learned Panel Counsel Sri.Sanmathi E.I. appearing for the Revenue signifies his consent to the proposal. In view of the above, appeal is disposed off as having been withdrawn with liberty as sought for. Costs made easy. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Cbc/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18 Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan