Case LawHigh Court › Ita/158/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/158/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cgi Information Systems And

High Court 22 Feb 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/158/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cgi Information Systems And
Date of order
22 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/158/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cgi Information Systems And, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn witn liberty as aforesaid.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE JZJ2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 202PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL| 1LT.A. NO.158 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 41TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU - 560 095.BENGALURU - 560 095. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX. INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE-1(2), 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING SO FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095. (BY MR.K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) _... APPELLANTS AND* M/s.CGI INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND|MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. NO.95/1 AND 95/2, E CITY TOWER-2ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE-1, WESTBENGALURU - 560 100..., RESPONDENT THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX|ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 05.04.2021 PASSED IN ITA NO.737/BANG/2020 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14,PRAYING TO: |(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW)STATED ABOVE. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE,INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.737/BANG/2020—DATED: 05.04.7021 FOR THE ASSESMENT YEAR 2013-14 ANDETC. THIS ILT.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS DAY, | ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the revenue has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal witnoutprejudice to the right of the revenue to raise the issues|invoived in this appeal, in other appeals. Tne aforesaidmemo ts taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn witn liberty as aforesaid. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-—JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan