Ita/1600/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. South Malabar Gramin Bank Ltd
High Court
15 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1600/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. South Malabar Gramin Bank Ltd
Date of order
15 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1600/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. South Malabar Gramin Bank Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 415 and 417of 2009 and connected cases, we dismiss the department appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 24TH BHADRA 1931
ITA.No. 1600 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.573/COCH/2006 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CALICUT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
SOUTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK LTD,
MALAPPURAM.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 15/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K. MOHANAN, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 1600 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 15th day of September, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Following the judgment of this Court in I.T.A.Nos. 415 and 417of 2009 and connected cases, we dismiss the department appeal.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(V.K. MOHANAN)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue