Ita/1612/2009 Of The Commissnr Of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. Shri.b.sivaprasad Chithra Bhavan
High Court
18 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1612/2009 Of The Commissnr Of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. Shri.b.sivaprasad Chithra Bhavan
Date of order
18 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1612/2009 Of The Commissnr Of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. Shri.b.sivaprasad Chithra Bhavan, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 27TH BHADRA 1931
ITA.No. 1612 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.908/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT:
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
SRI.B.SIVAPRASAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-3.
CHITRA BHAVAN, PACHALOOR P.O.,
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 18/09/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.1612 of 2009
....................................................................
Dated this the 18th day of September, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal as the amount of taxinvolved is below the threshold limit for filing appeal under CBDTnorms, we do not think there is any justification to entertain the appealby this court against the order of the Tribunal under Section 260A ofthe Income Tax Act. Consequently appeal is dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
V.K.MOHANANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue