Ita/1614/2005 Of The Commr Of Income Tax Bangalore v. N Bhagya
High Court
28 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/1614/2005 Of The Commr Of Income Tax Bangalore v. N Bhagya
Date of order
28 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1614/2005 Of The Commr Of Income Tax Bangalore v. N Bhagya, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2DIn view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as SUC)N.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 28 DAY OF JANUARY, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD|
ITA NO.1614 OF 2005
BETWEEN‘
1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX|CIT(A), C.R. BUILDINGCIT(A), C.R. BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU.
2.|THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-15INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-15
C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD
BENGALURU.... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.V. ARVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. BHAGYA NNO.146, 2 CROSSCANARA BANK COLONYNAGARABHAVI ROAD,BENGALURU - 560 0/7?.
. RESPONDENT|
THIS APPEAL JIS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OFINCOMETAXAC]1961,.ARISINGOUT.ORDER.DATED:01.11.2004 PASSED IN ITA NO. 1915/BANG/2004, FOR
THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-2002, PRAYING TO FORMULATETHE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND|ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY|THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITANO.1915/BANG/2004DATED:01.11.72004CONFIRMING THE!ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THEORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CIRCLE-15, BENGALURU AND EITC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI.MALIMATH J.fDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Tne learned counsel for the appellants submits tnat|tne appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary|limits and also in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated|11.07.2018 passed by Director(ITJ), Central Board of.
Direct Taxes, New Delni..
2DIn view of the submission made, the appeal is
dismissed as SUC)N.
SD/- SD/-
JUDGE JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.