Ita/16/2006 Of Commssioner Of Income Tax , Dehradun v. Rashmi Goyal
High Court
04 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ita/16/2006 Of Commssioner Of Income Tax , Dehradun v. Rashmi Goyal
Date of order
04 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/16/2006 Of Commssioner Of Income Tax , Dehradun v. Rashmi Goyal, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA No. 16 of 2006
CLMA Delay Condonation Application No. 5103 of 2008 MCC Recall/Restoration Application No. 941 of 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.
Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J.
Mr. Arvind Vashisth, learned Assistant
Solicitor General for the Central Govt./appellant. None appears for assessee/respondent. The recall application is barred by 292 days. Explanation given in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application is not convincing, therefore, we are not satisfied to condone the delay. Accordingly, both the applications are rejected.
(B.C. Kandpal, J.) (P.C. Verma, J. ) 4.9.2008 4.9.2008
Rathour/Saleem
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue