Case LawHigh Court › Ita/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm v. S.balu,M/S.anugraha Buildrs

High Court 10 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm v. S.balu,M/S.anugraha Buildrs
Date of order
10 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm v. S.balu,M/S.anugraha Buildrs, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since counsel for the appellant submitted that appeals filedagainst remand orders have become infructuous because freshassessments after remand under impugned orders led to further appealswhich are pending before the Tribunal, we dismiss the appeals asinfructuous leaving it open to the parties to co...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931 ITA.No. 16 of 2009() -------------------- ITA.379/COCH/2003 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT ------------------------ S.BALU, M/S. ANUGRAHA BUILDERS, TRIVANDRUM. ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN FOR R SMT.C.K.SHERIN FOR R SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN FOR R THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2009, ALONG WITH ITA NO.33 OF 2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. .................................................................... I.T. Appeal Nos.16 & 33 of 2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since counsel for the appellant submitted that appeals filedagainst remand orders have become infructuous because freshassessments after remand under impugned orders led to further appealswhich are pending before the Tribunal, we dismiss the appeals asinfructuous leaving it open to the parties to contest all issues in appealspending before the Tribunal against revised assessments. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge pms C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan