Ita/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm v. S.balu,M/S.anugraha Buildrs
High Court
10 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm v. S.balu,M/S.anugraha Buildrs
Date of order
10 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/16/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm v. S.balu,M/S.anugraha Buildrs, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Since counsel for the appellant submitted that appeals filedagainst remand orders have become infructuous because freshassessments after remand under impugned orders led to further appealswhich are pending before the Tribunal, we dismiss the appeals asinfructuous leaving it open to the parties to co...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931
ITA.No. 16 of 2009()
--------------------
ITA.379/COCH/2003 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
----------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRIVANDRUM
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT
------------------------
S.BALU, M/S. ANUGRAHA BUILDERS,
TRIVANDRUM.
ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN FOR R
SMT.C.K.SHERIN FOR R
SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN FOR R
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 10/06/2009, ALONG WITH ITA NO.33 OF 2009, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T. Appeal Nos.16 & 33 of 2009
....................................................................
Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since counsel for the appellant submitted that appeals filedagainst remand orders have become infructuous because freshassessments after remand under impugned orders led to further appealswhich are pending before the Tribunal, we dismiss the appeals asinfructuous leaving it open to the parties to contest all issues in appealspending before the Tribunal against revised assessments.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.