Ita/16/2017 Of Rolls Royce Singapore Pte Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ita/16/2017 Of Rolls Royce Singapore Pte Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/16/2017 Of Rolls Royce Singapore Pte Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn; the liberty, as prayed for, is hereby granted.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHANDAT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 16 of 2017
26 MARCH, 2021
Between:
Rolls Royce Singapore PTE LTD.
…Appellant
and
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …………Respondent
Counsel for the : Mr. Chetan Joshi, appellant learned counsel Counsel for the respondent : Mr. H.M. Bhatia, learned counsel
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
The appellant has filed an application for withdrawing the present appeal.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant would like to withdraw this appeal. He seeks the liberty of this Court to challenge any adverse
order that may be passed against the assessee. Therefore,
this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn; the liberty, as prayed for, is hereby granted.
3. disposed of accordingly.
The withdrawal application No.8178 of 2021 is
_____________________________
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.
Dt: 26[th] March, 2021 JKJ/Pant
___________________
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.