Case LawHigh Court › Ita/162/2010 Of Tha Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/162/2010 Of Tha Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rajalakshami Jayaprasad

High Court 01 Jun 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/162/2010 Of Tha Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rajalakshami Jayaprasad
Date of order
01 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/162/2010 Of Tha Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rajalakshami Jayaprasad, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2010 / 11TH JYAISTHA 1932 ITA.No. 162 of 2010() --------------------- ITA.136/2008 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/APPELLANT ------------------------------ SMT.RAJALAKSHMI JAYAPRASAD, M/S.STERIPHARM,CSEZ,KAKKANAD. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. --------------------------- I.T.A No. 162 OF 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 1[st ]day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. Following the judgment in I.T.A. No. 1420 of 2009, we dismissthis appeal also. Registry shall attach a copy of the commonjudgment in the above case to form part of this judgment. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR (JUDGE ) vps P.S.GOPINATHAN (JUDGE )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan