Case Law › High Court › Ita/163/2011 M/S. Magnum Industries v. T...

Ita/163/2011 M/S. Magnum Industries v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Xvi, Kolkata

High Court 04 Mar 2024 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · calcutta_original_side

Parties

Date of order

04 Mar 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/163/2011 M/S. Magnum Industries v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Xvi, Kolkata, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.Since none appears for the appellant to press the appeal, therefore, theappeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/163/2011M/S. MAGNUM INDUSTRIESVERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, XVI, KOLKATA BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANIAND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date : 4[th] March 2024. Appearance: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Advocate… for the respondent.… for the respondent. 1.Case called out. None appears for the appellant to press the appeal whichis pending in this Court for last about 13 years. Sri SoumenBhattacharjee, learned counsel for the respondent has filed today anaffidavit of service pursuant to our order dated 24.01.2024.is pending in this Court for last about 13 years. Sri SoumenBhattacharjee, learned counsel for the respondent has filed today anaffidavit of service pursuant to our order dated 24.01.2024. 2.Since none appears for the appellant to press the appeal, therefore, theappeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.) S. Kumar (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.