Ita/164/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Pkl v. Sh Sanjay Anand
High Court
13 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/164/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Pkl v. Sh Sanjay Anand
Date of order
13 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/164/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Pkl v. Sh Sanjay Anand, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
FSR S
ITA No.164 of 2003 (O&M)Date of Decision: 13.09.2018
FSR S
Commissioner of Income-tax, Panchkula...Appellant
VS|
... Respondent|
Sanjay Anand
KK O
Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Surya KantHon’ble Mr.Justice Sudip AhluwaliaHon’ble Mr.Justice Sudip Ahluwalia
FE SE
Present:Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant ©
Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondent|
FE SE
SURYA KANT J. (Oral)
&'(Learned counsel for Revenue states that the tax effect involved|in this case 1s)a20,48,032/- and in view of the recent Circular No.3/2018dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, a photocopy whereof is taken onrecord and is marked as Mark ‘A’, the tax effect being less thana50 lacs,he does not want to press this appeal on merits.
&*(In view of the CBDT Circular, the instant appeal is dismissedas not pressed. As prayed for by learned counsel for the appellant, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to seek revival of the appeal, if need be, in thechanged circumstances. The question of law is also kept open. |
13.09.2018vishal shonkar
1. Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes2. Whether reportable? |NoV.Vishal2018.09.17 16:57I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document
(Surya Kant)Judge
(Sudip Ahluwalia)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.