Ita/1644/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trivandrum v. Kerala Livestock Development Board Ltd
High Court
24 Sep 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1644/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trivandrum v. Kerala Livestock Development Board Ltd
Date of order
24 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1644/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trivandrum v. Kerala Livestock Development Board Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The question raised is whether the Tribunal was justified inallowing provision for gratuity.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
THURSDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 2ND ASWINA 1931
ITA.No. 1644 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.639/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
THIRUVANNTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
KERALA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT BOARD LTD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 24/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 1644 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of September, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The question raised is whether the Tribunal was justified inallowing provision for gratuity. Even though standing counselsubmitted that the provision cannot be allowed, we notice from theTribunal's order that the liability was ascertained through actualvaluation. Further there is nothing to doubt the genuineness of theclaim because the assessee is an organisation under the control of theGovernment engaged in livestock development. We therefore dismissthe appeal.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
(V.K. MOHANAN)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.