Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1644/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Ita/1644/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trivandrum v. Kerala Livestock Development Board Ltd

High Court 24 Sep 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1644/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trivandrum v. Kerala Livestock Development Board Ltd
Date of order
24 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1644/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trivandrum v. Kerala Livestock Development Board Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The question raised is whether the Tribunal was justified inallowing provision for gratuity.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 2ND ASWINA 1931 ITA.No. 1644 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.639/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANNTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- KERALA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT BOARD LTD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 1644 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The question raised is whether the Tribunal was justified inallowing provision for gratuity. Even though standing counselsubmitted that the provision cannot be allowed, we notice from theTribunal's order that the liability was ascertained through actualvaluation. Further there is nothing to doubt the genuineness of theclaim because the assessee is an organisation under the control of theGovernment engaged in livestock development. We therefore dismissthe appeal. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan