Ita/1647/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. M/S.omega Electronics Industrial Estate
High Court
02 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1647/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. M/S.omega Electronics Industrial Estate
Date of order
02 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1647/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. M/S.omega Electronics Industrial Estate, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
TUESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2010 / 13TH MAGHA 1931
ITA.No. 1647 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.34/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
-------------------------
M/S.OMEGA ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
PAPPANAMCODE, TRIVANDRUM.
ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN FOR R1
SMT.C.K.SHERIN FOR R1
SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN FOR R1
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 02/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.1647 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2010.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since tax effect is below the monetary limit, Standing Counselrequested for withdrawal of appeal. Consequently appeal is dismissedas withdrawn leaving freedom to the appellant to claim eligible refundof court fee.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
P.S.GOPINATHANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.