Case Law › High Court › Ita/166/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/166/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri Babu Mathew, Cochin

High Court 14 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

14 Jul 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/166/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri Babu Mathew, Cochin, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the submission somade, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2016/23RD ASHADHA, 1938 ITA.No. 166 of 2009 ( ) ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 532/COCH/1999 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 18-08-2003 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT: ---------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT: -------------- SRI.BABU MATHEW, M/S.BABU MATHEW & CO., SHARE & STOCK BROKERS,, KALOOR, COCHIN-682 017. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14-07-2016,ALONG WITH ITA.205/09 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ. ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. It is submitted by the senior counsel appearingfor the appellant that the Revenue is not desirous ofpursuing these appeals. In view of the submission somade, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, Judge. kkb. /True copy/ PS to Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.