Case LawHigh Court › Ita/1663/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita/1663/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Tvpm v. Shri.b.sivaprasad,Thiruvananthapuram

High Court 01 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1663/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Tvpm v. Shri.b.sivaprasad,Thiruvananthapuram
Date of order
01 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/1663/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Tvpm v. Shri.b.sivaprasad,Thiruvananthapuram, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently we dismiss this appeal also filed against thecommon order of the Tribunal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2009 / 9TH ASWINA 1931 ITA.No. 1663 of 2009() ---------------------- ITA.909/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT: --------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT ------------------------- B.SIVAPRASAD, CHITHRA BHAVAN, PACHALOOR P.O., TRIVANDRUM. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ....................................................................I.T.A. No.1663 of 2009 ....................................................................Dated this the 1st day of October, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The Tribunal declined to entertain the appeal filed by thedepartment against the order of the C.I.T.(Appeal) for the reason thattax amount is below the threshold limit fixed by the CBDT for filingappeal. Connected appeal filed by the Revenue was also dismissedby the Tribunal. We have dismissed the appeal filed against the saidorder. Consequently we dismiss this appeal also filed against thecommon order of the Tribunal. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge pms V.K.MOHANANJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan