Ita/167/2009 Of Commossioner Of Income Tax v. Shri P.k.kurien
High Court
29 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/167/2009 Of Commossioner Of Income Tax v. Shri P.k.kurien
Date of order
29 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/167/2009 Of Commossioner Of Income Tax v. Shri P.k.kurien, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is therefore dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2009 / 8TH ASHADHA 1931
ITA.No. 167 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.440/CO/1999 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/ APPELLANT(S):
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
SRI. P.K. KURIAN,
PROP: JOHNEY BROTHERS,
BASIN ROAD, ERNAKULAM.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 29/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. -----------------------------------
I.T.A. No.167 of 2009
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of June, 2009
J U D G M E N T----------------------
Ramachandran Nair,J.
Question raised pertains to valuation of property as on1.4.1981 for the purpose of assessment of capital gains. Theonly ground raised is that assessee declared lower value in thereturn which is taken by Assessing Officer. The assessee laterclaimed higher market value which was fixed by the appellateTribunal. No question of law arises from the order of appellateTribunal. Appeal is therefore dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
okb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.