Ita/167/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bangalore International Airport Ltd
High Court
13 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/167/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bangalore International Airport Ltd
Date of order
13 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/167/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Bangalore International Airport Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13 DAY OF MARCH 2015|
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND|
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
ITA NO 167 OF 2014
BETWEHR
1.THER COMMISSIONER OF|INCOME TAX, TDSINCOME TAX, TDS
NO.59, HMT BHAVAN
A FLOOR, BELLARY ROADGANGANAGAR, BANGALORE.GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE.
2.THER INCOME-TAX OFFICERWARD-16(2)NO.59, HMT BHAVAN:A FLOOR, BELLARY ROADWARD-16(2)NO.59, HMT BHAVAN:A FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD
GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE. |
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND
BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.|
ADMINISTRATION BLOCK, I BLOCK,
DEVANAHALLI,BANGALORE-560 300.
~~RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961,ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 07/11/2013 PASSED IN ITANO.502/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 PRAYINGTO 1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED
ABOVE 2) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSEDBY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.502/BANG/2013 DATED)711.2013ANI)CONFIRM|THECORIDK()RTHE.APPELLATE.COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THER ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-16(2), BANGALORE. .|
THISITACOMINGONKOR,ORDERSTHIS VINFET SARANwhDELIVERED THER FOLLOWING:
DAY,
JUDGMENT
In view of Instruction No.3/11 issued by the CentralBoard of Direct Tax (CBDT), since the tax effect in this case 1s
below Rs.10 lakhs, this appeal would not be maintainable.
Accordingly, the appeal isdismissed.
TL
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.