Ita/167/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. Odisha Construction Corporation Ltd
High Court
30 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Ita/167/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. Odisha Construction Corporation Ltd
Date of order
30 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/167/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. Odisha Construction Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Order No.
03.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No. 167 of 2018
….Principal Commissioner of Income AppellantTax-I, Bhubaneswar
Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel -versus- ….Odisha Construction Corporation Ltd. Respondent
None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
30.03.2022
I.A. No.26 of 2019
1. For the reasons stated therein, the application for dispensing with filing of certified copies of Annexures-2 and 3 are allowed.
2. The I.A. is disposed of.
ITA No.167 of 2018
3. The question of law sought to be urged by the Appellant – Revenue in this appeal reads as under:
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Tribunal is justified in allowing the provision of arrear salary claimed by the assessee as deduction in its P & L Account u/s 37 of the Income Tax Act by holding that it is an ascertained liability ?
4. On a perusal of the impugned order, it is revealed that the ITAT has followed its own order for earlier assessment years involving the same assessee. On the ground of consistency, the Court
declines to frame the question of law urged in the present appeal. The appeal is dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge S.K. Jena/P.A.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.